UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
☐REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
☒ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021
OR
☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
☐SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of event requiring this shell company report ______________
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________.
Commission file number 001-38866
TUFIN SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
5 HaShalom Road, ToHa Tower
Tel Aviv 6789205, Israel
(Address of principal executive offices)
Jack Wakileh
Telephone: +972 (3) 612-8118
Tufin Software Technologies Ltd.
5 HaShalom Road, ToHa Tower
Tel Aviv6789205, Israel
(Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and address of company contact person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
Trading Symbol(s) |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.015 per share |
TUFN |
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None.
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: As of December 31, 2021, the registrant had outstanding 37,851,120 ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.015 per share.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ☐ No ☒
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated file, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “ accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer ☐ |
Accelerated filer ☒ |
Non-accelerated filer ☐ |
Emerging growth company ☒ |
If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on the attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
Indicate by check mark which basis for accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financing statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP ☒ |
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ☐ |
Other ☐ |
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
☐ Item 17 ☐ Item 18
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ☐ No ☒
|
Page |
1 | |
1 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
32 | |
41 | |
42 | |
57 | |
79 | |
82 | |
83 | |
84 | |
97 | |
97 | |
98 | |
98 | |
98 | |
99 | |
99 | |
99 | |
100 | |
100 | |
100 | |
100 | |
101 | |
101 | |
101 | |
101 | |
101 | |
• |
the successful management of our business model,
as well as current and future growth, particularly with respect to the ongoing implementation of our plans to transition to a term-based
subscription license business model over time; |
• |
our intention to invest further in the Tufin
Orchestration Suite to extend its functionality and features; |
• |
our expectations regarding sales of our cloud
products; |
• |
competition we face in the security policy
management market, and our potential lack of sufficient financial or other resources in order to maintain or improve our competitive position;
|
• |
our expectations regarding growth in the market
for enterprise security and network management products; |
• |
our ability to compete and increase positive
market awareness of our brand, particularly with respect to markets for security policy management; |
• |
our expectation that policy-centric, automated
solutions will garner a growing share of enterprise security spend; |
• |
our expectations for growth in certain key
verticals and geographic regions and our intention to expand international operations; |
• |
our expectations regarding sales driven by
our relationships channel partners and our technology alliance partners through joint selling efforts and go-to-market strategies;
|
• |
customer relationships developed by our hybrid
sales model, including our ability to acquire new customers and retain existing customers; |
• |
our dependence on a single third-party manufacturer
to fulfill certain software license orders; |
• |
our expectations concerning seasonality and
the predictability of our sales cycle; |
• |
our ability to align our future and past performance
by continuing to generate sufficient revenues; |
• |
the compatibility and integration of our product
and service offerings with customers’ existing technology infrastructures and applications; |
• |
our plans to deploy additional cloud-based
subscription products and promote our brand over time, to enable more customers to consume our products beyond our existing on-premise
solutions; |
• |
our reliance on certain products and customers
to generate revenue; |
• |
compliance, managerial and regulatory risks
associated with international sales and operations; |
• |
the effect of any real or perceived shortcomings,
defects or vulnerabilities in our solutions; |
• |
political conditions and economic downturns,
particularly in areas where we operate; |
• |
the impact of COVID-19 on the budgets of our
customers and on economic conditions generally; |
• |
the effect of cybersecurity threats or attacks
on our technologies, products and services; |
• |
our compliance with laws, regulations
and requirements in the jurisdictions where we operate, including with respect to with data protection and privacy and export and import
control requirements; |
• |
the outcome of certain litigation relating
to our initial public offering; |
• |
our ability to adequately protect and defend
our intellectual property and other proprietary rights; |
• |
our ability to effectively manage, invest in,
train, grow and retain our sales force, research and development capabilities, marketing team and other key personnel; |
• |
our ability to maintain effective internal
controls over financial reporting; |
• |
the volatility of our share price and active
trading market for our shares; |
• |
political, economic, governmental and tax consequences
associated with our incorporation and location in Israel; |
• |
our expectations regarding our tax classifications.
|
A. |
[Reserved] |
B. |
Capitalization and Indebtedness |
C. |
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds |
D. |
Risk Factors |
• |
our revenues and cash flows may fluctuate more
than anticipated over the short and mid-term; |
• |
if new or current customers do not desire to
consume our offerings under a subscription model, our subscription sales may lag behind our expectations; |
• |
the shift to a term-based subscription license
model may raise concerns among new or existing customers, resellers and investors, including concerns with respect to changes to pricing
over time and access to our products once a given subscription has expired, which could slow adoption rates; |
• |
our success in maintaining or implementing
our target pricing or new pricing models, product adoption and projected renewal rates, or selection of a target price or new pricing
model that is not optimal and could negatively affect our sales or earnings; |
• |
the shift to term-based subscription license
may create a subscription pricing disadvantage against our competition and increase our loss rates against competition; |
• |
our failure in implementing or maintaining
adequate subscription-based pricing models could negatively affect adoption, renewal rates and our business results. |
• |
if our customers do not renew their subscriptions
or do not renew them on a timely basis, our revenues may decline and our business may suffer; |
• |
we may incur sales compensation costs at a
higher than forecasted rate if the pace of our subscription transition is faster than anticipated; |
• |
we may see increased discounting behavior from
our sales force and, if we are unable to monitor, prevent and manage such discounting behavior successfully and in a timely manner, our
business and financial results will be negatively affected; |
• |
our sales force may not be successful in selling under a term-based subscription license model, which may
lead to increased sales headcount turnover rates; and |
• |
investors, industry and financial analysts may have difficulties understanding the shift in our business
model or interpret the transition to the term-based subscription license model as having a negative impact on the Company’s value,
resulting in changes in analysts’ financial analysis and impairment of the Company’s valuation |
• |
increased purchasing power and leverage held
by large organizations in negotiating contractual arrangements with us, including, in certain cases, clauses that provide preferred pricing
of configurations with similar specifications; |
• |
the timing of individual large sales, which
in some cases have occurred in a quarter subsequent to those we anticipated, or have not occurred at all; |
• |
longer sales cycles and the associated risk
that substantial time and resources may be spent on a potential customer that ultimately elects not to purchase our products or purchases
fewer products than we anticipated; |
• |
more stringent or costly requirements imposed
upon us in our maintenance and professional services contracts with such customers, including stricter response times and penalties for
any failure to meet maintenance and professional services requirements; |
• |
more complicated and costly implementation
processes and network infrastructure; and |
• |
closer relationships with, and increased dependence
upon, large technology companies who may offer competing products and have stronger brand recognition. |
• |
changes in fiscal or contracting policies;
|
• |
decreases in available government funding;
|
• |
changes in government programs or applicable
requirements; |
• |
the adoption of new laws or regulations or
changes to existing laws or regulations; and |
• |
potential delays or changes in the government
appropriations or other funding authorization processes. |
• |
greater difficulty in enforcing contracts and
managing collections, as well as longer collection periods; |
• |
higher costs of doing business internationally,
including costs incurred in establishing and maintaining office space and equipment for our international operations; |
• |
management communication and integration problems
resulting from cultural and geographic dispersion; |
• |
risks associated with trade restrictions and foreign legal requirements, including any importation, certification,
and localization of our products that may be required in foreign countries; |
• |
greater risk of unexpected changes in regulatory
practices, tariffs and tax laws and treaties; |
• |
compliance with anti-bribery laws, including,
without limitation, compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the bribery sections of the Israeli Penal Law, 5737-1977 and
the U.K. Bribery Act; |
• |
heightened risk of unfair or corrupt business
practices in certain geographies and of improper or fraudulent sales arrangements that may impact financial results and result in restatements
of, or irregularities in, financial statements; |
• |
the uncertainty of protection for intellectual
property rights in some countries; |
• |
fluctuations in currency exchange rates; |
• |
general political and economic conditions,
including due to the impact of COVID-19, in these foreign markets; and |
• |
double taxation of our international earnings
and potentially adverse tax consequences due to changes in the tax laws of the United States, Israel or the other jurisdictions in which
we operate. |
• |
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our results
of operations; |
• |
variance in our financial performance from
the expectations of market analysts; |
• |
announcements by us or our competitors of significant
business developments, changes in service provider relationships, acquisitions or expansion plans; |
• |
changes in the prices of our products and services;
|
• |
our involvement in litigation; |
• |
our sale of ordinary shares or other securities
in the future; |
• |
market conditions in our industry; |
• |
changes in key personnel; |
• |
the trading volume of our ordinary shares;
|
• |
changes in the estimation of the future size
and growth rate of our markets; and |
• |
general economic and market conditions, including
with respect to COVID-19 and/or geopolitical instability. |
A. |
History and Development of the Company |
B. |
Business Overview |
• |
Policy-centric
approach. We enable enterprises to visualize, define and enforce a unified security policy that acts as the foundation of governance
and control, replacing ad-hoc configurations across fragmented networks. |
• |
Automated
network changes. We automate the network change process across complex, heterogeneous environments, increasing business agility,
enabling faster application deployment and reducing human error. |
• |
Data-driven
insights. Our approach draws data from across a customer’s IT and cloud environments, providing insights on connectivity
and end-to-end visibility across the network. |
• |
Open
and extensible framework. Our open solutions serve as a centralized control layer for our customers’ networks and cloud environments,
and can connect to a wide range of third-party technologies through application program interfaces, or APIs. |
• |
Increasing
frequency and sophistication of cyberattacks. Enterprises worldwide are under constant security threat from both external cyberattacks
and malicious insiders in search of sensitive information and vital systems. Cyberattacks are increasingly able to breach networks and
cloud infrastructures, and locate and steal sensitive enterprise data. As a result, numerous enterprise boards are prioritizing and reshaping
their cybersecurity approaches. |
• |
Growing
complexity of software-defined networks. Enterprises have been undergoing a digital transformation. They are rapidly shifting on-premise
workloads to cloud environments to meet the changing demands of their markets and customers. To keep pace with this transformation, enterprises
design scalable and flexible workloads and connections, which increase network complexity and the velocity of changes. The rise of technologies
such as microservices and containers introduces additional complexity. The growing use of these dynamic technologies has raised business
expectations on agility and increased the need for a unified security approach across networks, applications and the cloud. |
• |
Accelerating
pace of application development and deployment. The accelerating pace of business and technological developments requires numerous
and continuous application and infrastructure changes. The rise of the DevOps model, which is a set of software development practices
that allows applications and features to be rapidly developed and deployed, has led to increased release velocity. Enterprises that use
manual change processes struggle to keep pace and lack policy consistency, resulting in an ever-growing backlog of changes, delayed software
releases and heightened security exposure. |
• |
Evolving
regulatory and compliance requirements. Global enterprises need to maintain compliance with a new wave of government regulations,
corporate security policies and industry standards related to privacy and cybersecurity. Manual changes to network policy are difficult
to track and are more likely to be non-compliant. As a result, enterprises seek cost-efficient security solutions to meet compliance requirements.
|
• |
Legacy
security approaches can no longer address cybersecurity threats in the ever-changing IT and cloud environments. Traditional security
policy management approaches address governance and control, but lack critical characteristics such as a unified security policy, automation,
scalability, end-to-end visibility and extensibility. We believe a new approach to enterprise security is necessary: a data-driven framework
centered on policy management and operationalized through automation. |
• |
Policy definition.
SecureTrack includes our unified security policy, which visualizes, defines and enforces a zone-to-zone segmentation policy that dictates
how users, systems and applications can communicate across the entire enterprise. Our unified security policy serves as the security policy
framework for the Tufin Orchestration Suite. |
• |
Security and
compliance. SecureTrack provides monitoring, assessment and alerts on security and compliance risk, ensuring real-time accountability,
transparency and consistency with the unified security policy. It also generates a variety of configurable audit reports that support
regulatory compliance standards. |
• |
Visibility.
SecureTrack builds a dynamic topology map of network connectivity across the enterprise and the cloud. It also provides real-time visibility
into all security policy configurations and changes. This visibility enables security teams to efficiently manage configuration changes,
troubleshoot problems and prepare for audits. |
• |
Business agility.
SecureChange increases business agility through security change automation. It automates manual change processes, giving them the ability
to implement changes in minutes instead of days. |
• |
Security and
compliance. SecureChange proactively checks every change request for risk and compliance against the unified security policy before
and after changes are implemented. It also maintains comprehensive ticket and process documentation, which reduces the need for painstaking
information gathering and analysis before internal and external audits. |
• |
Control and
accuracy. SecureChange reduces inaccuracies due to human error through automated change design and provisioning for multi-vendor
environments. |
• |
Visibility
and control. SecureApp provides an intuitive interface to define application-critical connectivity needs. It serves as a central
repository of application connectivity requirements and indicates current connectivity status. |
• |
Business continuity
and agility. SecureApp monitors network device configurations and alerts security administrators to changes that could affect application
availability. SecureApp also provides graphical diagnostic tools that help our customers identify, troubleshoot and automatically repair
connectivity issues. By providing detailed insight into an application’s connectivity needs and status, SecureApp accelerates service
deployment, provides business continuity and simplifies network operations. |
• |
Security and
compliance. SecureApp proactively creates clean, reliable network configurations. It automatically recommends policy rule changes
and decommissions unnecessary network access paths that can lead to a security breach. |
• |
Visibility.
SecureCloud provides visibility into the security of application connectivity in the cloud through the assessment of cloud access controls.
SecureCloud displays vulnerabilities and overly permissive access paths. ensuring adherence to industry standards and best practices.
|
• |
Security Guardrails.
SecureCloud defines policies to secure application connectivity across cloud-native, multi-cloud, and hybrid-cloud -platforms. SecureCloud
automatically generates the cloud-native control code required to enforce these policies, saving enterprises the cost and overhead of
using third-party products that introduce proprietary control points across their cloud environment. |
• |
Continuous
Compliance. SecureCloud integrates directly into cloud-native application development processes and DevOps CI/CD automation pipelines,
ensuring continuous compliance checks of enterprise security policy throughout the entire life-cycle of cloud application development
and deployment efforts. |
• |
Enterprise-wide
Security Policy Management. With SecureCloud, Tufin Orchestration Suite provides a comprehensive platform that enterprises can
use to manage security policies across their entire estate, from on-premise to hybrid cloud environments. |
• |
Out-of-the-Box
Integration. VMA provides out-of-the-box integration with the most widely used vulnerability management solutions, including Rapid7
Nexpose, Rapid7 InsightVM, Qualys VMDR, Tenable.io, and Tenable.sc. |
• |
Risk Mitigation.
Tufin VMA automates risk mitigation by implementing network changes that block access to the critical asset until vulnerability remediation
efforts can be fully implemented. |
• |
Comprehensive
Dashboard. VMA also includes a comprehensive dashboard, monitors and measures risk exposure over time, and highlights overall vulnerability
exposure and the impact of mitigation and remediation efforts networkwide. |
• |
Topology intelligence.
Our topology intelligence engine uses network routing algorithms to calculate the paths between different points on the network and provides
our customers with a graphic display of devices and data flows. Network administrators use our topology intelligence to quickly determine
which devices and cloud platforms a network connection can traverse, which enables them to automate network path analysis and troubleshoot
issues. |
• |
Network usage
analysis engine. Our network usage analysis engine detects unused elements of a security policy by analyzing network flows and
traffic hits over a specified time period. Our technology leverages an automated workflow process to decommission unnecessary access and
reduce the attack surface. |
• |
Policy analysis
engine. Our policy analysis engine calculates the expected connectivity and access behavior of network devices and cloud platforms.
Security administrators can use different parameters and logic to determine in real time if supported network devices and cloud security
groups will allow or block specific connections. |
• |
Risk and compliance
analysis engines. Our risk engine proactively analyzes risk by identifying potential security violations, checking the existing
configuration or the proposed access changes against the unified security policy. Our compliance analysis engine creates an audit trail
in real time by automatically documenting any remedial changes. |
• |
Change designer
engine. Our change designer engine automates enterprise security access requests. It first identifies the connection-relevant network
devices and cloud platforms based on topology intelligence, and then recommends the optimal policy change based on information from the
policy analysis engine. Our technology provides vendor-specific suggestions that maximize security and performance, while offering accurate
configuration changes designed to be intuitive and user friendly. |
• |
Change provisioning
engine. Our technology automatically implements policy changes approved by security administrators. Our automated change provisioning
engine supports all major network, security and cloud vendors. In zero-touch automation mode, our technology automatically applies recommended
policy changes without the need for human intervention. |
• |
Extensible APIs. Our technology features a RESTful API framework
to enable extensibility and interoperability with third-party systems, including ticketing and service management systems such as ServiceNow
and BMC Remedy. Our professional services team, as well as our customers and partners, use the API framework to supplement the Tufin Orchestration
Suite with additional functionality by integrating with the third-party security ecosystem. We integrate with leading network and cloud
platforms, such as Checkpoint, Cisco, Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, F5 Networks, Forcepoint, Juniper Networks, VMware, AWS, Google Cloud,
Microsoft Azure and Kubernetes, to provide vendor agnostic solutions, which is key to our value proposition. In addition, we believe our
technology alliance partner program, which is an ecosystem of technology partners who build certified integrations to our products, helps
to expand our common use cases. |
• |
Distributed
architecture. Customers can deploy our products across multiple distributed servers. Rather than monitoring all devices and platforms
from a single server, remote collectors monitor local network devices (e.g., firewalls and routers), process the raw data and upload compressed
data to a central server over a secure connection. Using a fully distributed architecture, our products can easily scale to meet the demands
of large organizations. |
• |
SaaS architecture.
SecureCloud, is offered as Software-as-a-Service, and is able to scale up and scale out to meet the demands of various customer deployment
scenarios and architectures, with built in multi-tenancy and high availability. |
• |
Tufin Orchestration
Suite Aurora. Aurora is the next generation of the Tufin Orchestration Suite, which runs in microservices on Kubernetes. This architecture
will enable us to offer SecureTrack, SecureChange, and SecureApp to our customers as a service in the future. Aurora allows for more agile
research and development and gives us the ability to scale out to the largest networks in the world, advancing our leadership in scalability.
Also, Aurora provides a refresh and more modern user interface that customers will find easy and intuitive to use. |
• |
security change automation; |
• |
multi-vendor integration and heterogeneous
network topology; |
• |
application connectivity in modern IT and cloud
environments; |
• |
efficacy in provisioned and cloud-native environments;
|
• |
suitability for DevOps processes and microservice
architectures; |
• |
scalability and overall performance; and
|
• |
strong relationships with existing IT vendors.
|
C. |
Organizational Structure |
Name of Subsidiary |
Place of Incorporation | |
Tufin Software North America Inc. |
Delaware, United States | |
Tufin Software Europe Limited |
United Kingdom | |
Tufin Software France SARL |
France | |
Tufin Software Germany GmbH |
Germany | |
Tufin Software Australia Pty Ltd |
Australia | |
Tufin Software SRL |
Romania |
D. |
Property, Plants and Equipment |
• |
Number of
Customers. We believe the size of our customer base is an indicator of our market penetration and our net customer additions are
an indicator of the growth of our business and future revenue opportunity. We believe we have a significant opportunity to expand our
footprint through new installations and displacement of our competitors’ solutions. To do so, we plan to continue to grow our sales
team, leverage our channel partner relationships and enhance our marketing efforts. |
• |
Revenues from Existing Customers. We believe our existing customers
provide a significant source of revenue growth. We derive an increasing portion of our revenues from existing customers. For example,
during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021, we generated approximately 71% and 73% of our revenues, respectively, excluding maintenance
renewals, from existing customers. |
• |
Maintenance
Renewal Rates. We believe our maintenance renewal rates are an important metric to measure our ability to provide significant value
to our existing customers. We generate incremental maintenance revenues when our customers renew their maintenance contracts. We measure
the maintenance renewal rate of our customers over a trailing 12-month period, based on a dollar renewal rate of contracts expiring during
that time period. For each of the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021, our maintenance renewal rate was over 90%. Our key strategies
to maintain our renewal rate include continuing to provide more valuable features and network device coverage in our product updates,
focusing on the quality and reliability of our customer service and support and ensuring our customers receive value from our products.
|
• |
Sales to Large
Organizations. In the year ended December 31, 2021, large organizations, which we define as those comprising the Global 2000, accounted
for 64% of our revenues, compared to 63% of our revenues in the year ended December 31, 2020, in each case excluding maintenance renewals.
Sales to large organizations involve a distinct set of opportunities and challenges. Large organizations sales are characterized by longer
sales cycles and additional time and resources spent on a potential customer. |
• |
Seasonality.
We generally expect an increase in business activity in the fourth quarter, driven by our customers’ buying patterns. We believe
that these seasonal trends will continue to affect our quarterly results. The loss or delay of one or more large transactions in a quarter
could impact our anticipated results of operations for that quarter and future quarters for which revenues from that transaction is delayed.
|
• |
Non-GAAP Gross
Profit, non-GAAP Operating Income (Loss) and Non-GAAP Net Loss. We believe that providing non-GAAP financial measures that exclude, as applicable, share-based compensation expense
and certain non-recurring costs, as well as, the tax effect of these non-GAAP adjustments, allows for more
meaningful comparisons between our operating results from period to period. These non-GAAP financial measures are an important tool for
financial and operational decision-making and for evaluating our operating results over different periods. |
• |
“Non-GAAP gross profit” as gross profit excluding share-based compensation expense. |
• |
“Non-GAAP operating income (loss)” as operating income (loss) excluding share-based compensation
expense, shelf registration costs and one-time expenses associated with the reorganization of one of our subsidiaries. |
• |
“Non-GAAP net loss” as net loss excluding share-based compensation expense, shelf registration
costs and one-time expenses associated with the reorganization of one of our subsidiaries and the tax effect of these non-GAAP adjustments.
|
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||
2020 |
2021 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Gross profit |
$ |
80,587 |
$ |
87,837 |
||||
Non-GAAP gross profit |
82,611 |
89,649 |
||||||
|
||||||||
Operating loss |
$ |
(33,925 |
) |
$ |
(36,329 |
) | ||
Non-GAAP operating loss |
(18,452 |
) |
(22,433 |
) | ||||
|
||||||||
Net loss |
$ |
(35,406 |
) |
$ |
(36,926 |
) | ||
Non-GAAP net loss |
(20,634 |
) |
(25,820 |
) |
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||
2020 |
2021 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Reconciliation of Gross Profit to Non-GAAP Gross Profit:
|
||||||||
Gross profit |
$ |
80,587 |
$ |
87,837 |
||||
Add: |
||||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
$ |
2,024 |
$ |
1,812 |
||||
Non-GAAP gross profit |
$ |
82,611 |
$ |
89,649 |
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||
2020 |
2021 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Reconciliation of Operating Loss to Non-GAAP Operating Loss:
|
||||||||
Operating loss |
$ |
(33,925 |
) |
$ |
(36,329 |
) | ||
Add: |
||||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
$ |
15,025 |
$ |
13,896 |
||||
Shelf registration costs |
126 |
- |
||||||
One-time reorganization charges |
322 |
- |
||||||
Non-GAAP operating loss |
$ |
(18,452 |
) |
$ |
(22,433 |
) |
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||
2020 |
2021 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Reconciliation of Net Loss to Non-GAAP Net Loss: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ |
(35,406 |
) |
$ |
(36,329 |
) | ||
Add: |
||||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
$ |
15,025 |
$ |
13,896 |
||||
Shelf registration costs |
126 |
- |
||||||
One-time reorganization charges |
322 |
- |
||||||
Taxes on income related to non-GAAP adjustments |
(701 |
) |
(2,790 |
) | ||||
Non-GAAP net loss |
$ |
(20,634 |
) |
$ |
(25,820 |
) |
• |
Annualized
recurring revenues. We consider annualized recurring revenues (“ARR”) as a performance indicator which is defined as
the annualized value of active term-based subscription license contracts, SaaS contracts and maintenance contracts related to perpetual
licenses in effect at the end of a period. Such contracts are annualized by dividing the total contract value by the number of months
of its term and multiplying by twelve (12). As of December 31, 2020 and 2021, ARR was approximately $60 million and $72 million, respectively.
The annualized value of contracts is a legal and contractual determination made by assessing the contractual terms with our customers.
ARR is not determined by reference to historical revenues, deferred revenues or any other GAAP financial measure over any period. ARR
is not a forecast of future revenues and should not be perceived as such. Our ARR, can be impacted by contract start and end dates and
renewal rates and does not include revenue associated with the sales of perpetual software licenses, hardware, or professional services.
|
A. |
Operating Results |
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||
2020 |
2021 |
|||||||||||||||
Amount |
% |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Product |
$ |
38,690 |
38.4 |
% |
$ |
46,593 |
42.0 |
% | ||||||||
Maintenance and professional services |
62,144 |
61.6 |
64,356 |
58.0 |
||||||||||||
Total revenues |
100,834 |
100.0 |
110,949 |
100.0 |
||||||||||||
Cost of revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Product |
2,940 |
2.9 |
3,291 |
3.0 |
||||||||||||
Maintenance and professional services |
17,307 |
17.2 |
19,821 |
17.9 |
||||||||||||
Total cost of revenues(1) |
20,247 |
20.1 |
23,112 |
20.8 |
||||||||||||
Gross profit |
80,587 |
79.9 |
87,837 |
79.2 |
||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Research and development(1) |
34,978 |
34.7 |
39,584 |
35.7 |
||||||||||||
Sales and marketing(1) |
59,484 |
59.0 |
60,378 |
54.4 |
||||||||||||
General and administrative(1) |
20,050 |
19.9 |
24,204 |
21.8 |
||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
114,512 |
113.6 |
124,166 |
111.9 |
||||||||||||
Operating loss |
$ |
(33,925 |
) |
(33.6 |
) |
$ |
(36,329 |
) |
(32.7 |
) | ||||||
Financial income (loss), net |
114 |
0.1 |
(1,104 |
) |
(1.0 |
) | ||||||||||
Loss before taxes on income |
$ |
(33,811 |
) |
(33.5 |
) |
$ |
(37,433 |
) |
(33.7 |
) | ||||||
Taxes on income |
(1,595 |
) |
(1.6 |
) |
507 |
(0.5 |
) | |||||||||
Net loss |
$ |
(35,406 |
) |
35.1 |
% |
$ |
(36,926 |
) |
(33.3 |
)% |
| |
(1) |
Includes share-based compensation expense as follows: |
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||
2020 |
2021 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Share-based Compensation Expense: |
||||||||
Cost of revenues |
$ |
2,024 |
$ |
1,812 |
||||
Research and development |
4,437 |
3,867 |
||||||
Sales and marketing |
4,635 |
3,772 |
||||||
General and administrative |
3,929 |
4,445 |
||||||
Total share-based compensation expenses |
$ |
15,025 |
$ |
13,896 |
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||
2020 |
2021 |
Change |
||||||||||||||
Amount |
Amount |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Product |
$ |
38,690 |
$ |
46,593 |
$ |
7,903 |
20.4 |
% | ||||||||
Maintenance and support |
50,794 |
53,975 |
3,181 |
6.3 |
% | |||||||||||
Professional services |
11,350 |
10,381 |
(969 |
) |
(8.5 |
)% | ||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ |
100,834 |
$ |
110,949 |
$ |
10,115 |
10.0 |
% |
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||
2020 |
2021 |
|||||||||||||||
Amount |
% |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
Americas |
$ |
54,645 |
54.2 |
% |
$ |
56,908 |
51.3 |
% | ||||||||
EMEA |
40,114 |
39.8 |
46,980 |
42.3 |
||||||||||||
APAC |
6,075 |
6.0 |
7,061 |
6.4 |
||||||||||||
Total |
$ |
100,834 |
100.0 |
% |
$ |
110,949 |
100 |
% |
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||
2020 |
2021 |
Change |
||||||||||||||
Amount |
Amount |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Product |
$ |
2,940 |
3,291 |
$ |
351 |
11.9 |
% | |||||||||
Maintenance and professional services |
17,307 |
19,821 |
2,514 |
14.5 | ||||||||||||
Total cost of revenues |
$ |
20,247 |
23,112 |
$ |
2,865 |
14.2 |
% |
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 |
2021 |
Gross Profit Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Profit |
Gross Margin |
Gross Profit |
Gross Margin |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ |
80,587 |
79.9 |
% |
$ |
87,837 |
79.2 |
% |
$ |
7,250 |
(0.9) |
% |
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||
2020 |
2021 |
Change |
||||||||||||||
Amount |
Amount |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
$ |
34,978 |
$ |
39,584 |
$ |
4,606 |
13.2 |
% | ||||||||
Sales and marketing |
59,484 |
60,378 |
894 |
1.5 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
20,050 |
24,204 |
4,154 |
20.7 |
||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ |
114,512 |
$ |
124,166 |
$ |
9,654 |
8.4 |
% |
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||
2020 |
2021 |
Change |
||||||||||||||
Amount |
Amount |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
Financial Income (expense), net |
$ |
114 |
$ |
(1,104 |
) |
$ |
(1,218 |
) |
(1,068 |
)% |
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||
2020 |
2021 |
Change |
||||||||||||||
Amount |
Amount |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
Taxes on income |
$ |
(1,595 |
) |
$ |
507 |
$ |
2,102 |
(132 |
)% |
•
|
Risk-Free
Interest Rate. We base the risk-free interest rate on the implied yield on currently available U.S. treasury zero-coupon securities
with a remaining term equal to the expected life of our options. |
•
|
Dividend Yield.
We base dividend yield on our historical experience and expectation of no future dividend payouts. We have historically not paid cash
dividends and have no foreseeable plans to pay cash dividends in the future. |
•
|
Expected Volatility.
We base expected share price volatility on the historical volatility of the ordinary shares of comparable companies that are publicly
traded, as well as the historical volatility of the Company’s ordinary shares. |
• |
Expected Term.
The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected option
term is calculated using the simplified method, as we concluded that currently our historical share option exercise experience does not
provide an adequate basis to estimate our expected option term. |
B. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
E. |
Critical Accounting Estimates |
A. |
Directors and Senior Management |
Name |
Age |
Position | ||
Executive Officers |
||||
Reuven Kitov |
48 |
Chief Executive Officer, Co-Founder and Chairman of the Board | ||
Reuven Harrison |
52 |
Chief Technology Officer, Co-Founder and Director | ||
Jack Wakileh |
50 |
Chief Financial Officer | ||
Yoram Gronich |
53 |
Senior Vice President of Products and Engineering | ||
Shay Dayan |
40 |
Vice President of Research and Development | ||
Raymond Brancato |
57 |
Chief Revenue Officer | ||
Non-Employee Directors |
||||
Tom Schodorf (1)(4) |
63 |
Lead Independent Director | ||
Ohad Finkelstein (4) |
61 |
Director | ||
Yuval Shachar (3)(4) |
59 |
Director | ||
Yair Shamir (3)(4) |
76 |
Director | ||
Edouard Cukierman (4) |
57 |
Director | ||
Peter Campbell (1)(2)(4) |
57 |
Director | ||
Dafna Gruber (1)(2)(3)(4) |
57 |
Director | ||
Brian Gumbel (2)(4) |
46 |
Director |
(1) |
Member of our audit committee. |
(2) |
Member of our compensation committee. |
(3) |
Member of our nominating and corporate governance committee. |
(4) |
Independent director under NYSE rules. |
B. |
Compensation |
Information Regarding the Covered Executive(1) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Position(2) |
Base Salary |
Benefits and Perquisites(3)
|
Variable Compensation(4)
|
Equity-Based Compensation(5)
|
Total |
|||||||||||||||
Raymond Brancato, Chief Revenue Officer |
$ |
320,075 |
$ |
59,485 |
$ |
351,726 |
$ |
1,473,151 |
$ |
2,204,437 |
||||||||||
Reuven Kitov, Chief Executive Officer |
$ |
300,000 |
$ |
46,297 |
$ |
288,667 |
$ |
658,937 |
$ |
1,293,901 |
||||||||||
Jack Wakileh, Chief Financial Officer |
$ |
289,966 |
$ |
139,162 |
$ |
130,322 |
$ |
460,938 |
$ |
1,020,388 |
||||||||||
Yoram Gronich, Senior Vice President of Products and Engineering
|
$ |
266,362 |
$ |
124,945 |
$ |
70,173 |
$ |
388,992 |
$ |
850,472 |
||||||||||
Reuven Harrison, Chief Technology Officer |
$ |
269,731 |
$ |
69,711 |
$ |
84,097 |
$ |
340,314 |
$ |
763,853 |
(1) |
In accordance with Israeli law, all amounts reported in the table are in terms of
cost to our company, as recorded in our financial statements. |
|
|
(2) |
All current executive officers listed in the table are full-time employees. Cash compensation
amounts denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar were converted into U.S. dollars at the average conversion rate for the year
ended December 31, 2021. |
| |
(3) |
Amounts reported in this column include benefits and perquisites, including those
mandated by applicable law. Such benefits and perquisites may include, to the extent applicable to each executive, payments, contributions
and/or allocations for savings funds, pension, severance, vacation, car or car allowance, medical insurances and benefits, risk insurances
(such as life, disability and accident insurances), convalescence pay, payments for social security, tax gross-up payments and other benefits
and perquisites consistent with our guidelines. |
|
|
(4) |
Amounts reported in this column refer to Variable Compensation such as earned commission,
incentive and bonus payments as recorded in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021. |
|
|
(5) |
Amounts reported in this column represent the expense recorded in our financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2021 with respect to equity-based compensation. Assumptions and key variables used in the calculation
of such amounts are described in Note 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements, which are included in this annual report.
|
C. |
Board Practices |
• |
the Class I directors consist of Edouard Cukierman, Reuven Harrison and Yuval Shachar, and their terms
will expire at our annual general meeting of shareholders to be held in 2023; |
• |
the Class II directors, consist of Ohad Finkelstein, Reuven Kitov and Brian Gumbel and their terms will
expire at our annual general meeting of shareholders to be held in 2024; and |
• |
the Class III directors consist of Yair Shamir, Tom Schodorf, Dafna Gruber and Peter Campbell and their
terms will expire at our annual general meeting of shareholders to be held in 2022. |
• |
Presiding at all meetings of the Board of Directors
at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors; |
• |
Serving as a liaison between the Chairman and
the independent directors; |
• |
Having the authority to recommend that the
Board of Directors retain consultants or advisers that report directly to the Board of Directors; |
• |
Approving information sent to the Board of
Directors; |
• |
Approving meeting agendas for the Board of
Directors; |
• |
Approving meeting schedules to assure that
there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items; |
• |
Having the authority to call meetings of the
independent directors; and |
• |
If requested by major shareholders, ensuring
that he is available for consultation and direct communication. |
• |
retaining and terminating our independent auditors,
subject to board of directors and shareholder ratification; |
• |
overseeing the independence, compensation and
performance of the company’s independent auditors; |
• |
the appointment, compensation, retention and
oversight of any accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit services;
|
• |
pre-approval of audit and non-audit services
to be provided by the independent auditors; |
• |
reviewing with management and our independent
directors our financial statements prior to their submission to the SEC; and |
• |
approval of certain transactions with office
holders and controlling shareholders, as described below, and other related party transactions. |
• |
recommending to the board of directors the
compensation policy for directors and executive officers, and to recommend to the board of directors once every three years whether the
compensation policy that had been approved should be extended for a period of more than three years; |
• |
recommending to the board of directors updates
to the compensation policy, from time to time, and examine its implementation; |
• |
deciding whether to approve the terms of office
and employment of directors and executive officers that require approval of the compensation committee; |
• |
deciding whether the compensation terms of
the chief executive officer, which were determined pursuant to the compensation policy, will be exempted from approval by the shareholders
because such approval would harm the ability to engage the chief executive officer; and |
• |
administering and, where applicable, recommending
to our board of directors regarding the awarding of employee equity grants. |
• |
the education, skills, experience, expertise
and accomplishments of the relevant office holder; |
• |
the office holder’s position, responsibilities
and prior compensation agreements with that office holder; |
• |
the ratio between the cost of the terms of
employment of an office holder and the cost of the employment of other employees of the company, including employees employed through
contractors who provide services to the company, in particular the ratio between such cost, the average and median salary of the employees
of the company, as well as the impact of such disparities on the work relationships in the company; |
• |
if the terms of employment include variable
components—the possibility of reducing variable components at the discretion of the board of directors and the possibility of setting
a limit on the value of non-cash variable equity-based components; and |
• |
if the terms of employment include severance
compensation—the term of employment or office of the office holder, the terms of his or her compensation during such period, the
company’s performance during the such period, his or her individual contribution to the achievement of the company goals and the
maximization of its profits and the circumstances under which he or she is leaving the company. |
• |
with regard to variable components: |
• |
with the exception of office holders who report
directly to the chief executive officer, determining the variable components on long-term performance basis and on measurable criteria;
however, the company may determine that an immaterial part of the variable components of the compensation package of an office holder’s
shall be awarded based on non-measurable criteria, if such amount is not higher than three monthly salaries per annum, while taking into
account such office holder contribution to the company; and |
• |
the ratio between variable and fixed components,
as well as the limit of the values of variable components at the time of their grant; |
• |
a condition under which the office holder will
return to the company, according to conditions to be set forth in the compensation policy, any amounts paid as part of his or her terms
of employment, if such amounts were paid based on information later to be discovered to be wrong, and such information was restated in
the company’s financial statements; |
• |
the minimum holding or vesting period of variable
equity-based components to be set in the terms of office or employment, as applicable, while taking into consideration long-term incentives;
and |
• |
a limit to retirement grants. |
• |
supporting and advising our board of directors
in selecting director nominees, consistent with the criteria approved by our board of directors, who are best able to fulfill the responsibilities
of a director; |
• |
overseeing the evaluation of our board of directors
and our management; and |
• |
otherwise taking a leadership role in shaping
our corporate governance establishing and maintaining effective corporate governance policies and practices, including developing and
recommending to our board of directors a set of corporate governance guidelines applicable to our company. |
• |
information on the advisability of a given action brought for his or her approval or performed by virtue of his or her position;
and |
• |
all other important information pertaining
to such action. |
• |
refrain from any act involving a conflict of
interest between the performance of his or her duties in the company and his or her other duties or personal affairs; |
• |
refrain from any activity that is competitive
with the business of the company; |
• |
refrain from exploiting any business opportunity
of the company for the purpose of gaining a personal advantage for himself or herself or others; and |
• |
disclose to the company any information or
documents relating to the company’s affairs which the office holder received as a result of his or her position as an office holder.
|
• |
the office holder’s relatives (spouse,
siblings, parents, grandparents, descendants, spouse’s descendants and the spouses of any of these people); or |
• |
any company in which the office holder or his
or her relatives holds 5% or more of the shares or voting rights, serves as a director or general manager or has the right to appoint
at least one director or the general manager. |
• |
a transaction other than in the ordinary course
of business; |
• |
a transaction that is not on market terms;
or |
• |
a transaction that may have a material impact
on the company’s profitability, assets or liabilities. |
• |
a majority of the shares held by shareholders
who have no personal interest in the transaction and are voting at the meeting must be voted in favor of approving the transaction, excluding
abstentions; or |
• |
the shares voted by shareholders who have no
personal interest in the transaction who vote against the transaction represent no more than 2% of the voting rights in the company.
|
• |
an amendment to the articles of association;
|
• |
an increase in the company’s authorized
share capital; |
• |
a merger; and |
• |
the approval of related party transactions
and acts of office holders that require shareholder approval. |
• |
a monetary liability incurred by or imposed
on the office holder in favor of another person pursuant to a court judgment, including pursuant to a settlement confirmed as judgment
or arbitrator’s decision approved by a competent court. However, if an undertaking to indemnify an office holder with respect to
such liability is provided in advance, then such an undertaking must be limited to events which, in the opinion of the board of directors,
can be foreseen based on the company’s activities when the undertaking to indemnify is given, and to an amount or according to criteria
determined by the board of directors as reasonable under the circumstances, and such undertaking shall detail the abovementioned foreseen
events and amount or criteria; |
• |
reasonable litigation expenses, including reasonable
attorneys’ fees, which were incurred by the office holder as a result of an investigation or proceeding filed against the office
holder by an authority authorized to conduct such investigation or proceeding, provided that such investigation or proceeding was either
(i) concluded without the filing of an indictment against such office holder and without the imposition on him of any monetary obligation
in lieu of a criminal proceeding, (ii) concluded without the filing of an indictment against the office holder but with the imposition
of a monetary obligation on the office holder in lieu of criminal proceedings for an offense that does not require proof of criminal intent
or (iii) in connection with a monetary sanction; |
• |
reasonable litigation expenses, including attorneys’
fees, incurred by the office holder or which were imposed on the office holder by a court (i) in a proceeding instituted against him or
her by the company, on its behalf, or by a third party, (ii) in connection with criminal indictment of which the office holder was acquitted
or (iii) in a criminal indictment which the office holder was convicted of an offense that does not require proof of criminal intent;
|
• |
expenses he or she incurs as a result of administrative
proceedings that may be instituted against him or her under Israeli securities laws, if applicable, and payments made to injured persons
under specific circumstances thereunder; and |
• |
any other matter in respect of which it is
permitted or will be permitted under applicable law to indemnify an office holder in the company. |
• |
a breach of the duty of loyalty to the company,
provided that the office holder acted in good faith and had a reasonable basis to believe that the act would not harm the company;
|
• |
a breach of duty of care to the company or
to another person, to the extent such a breach arises out of the negligent conduct of the office holder; |
• |
a monetary liability imposed on the office
holder in favor of a third party; |
• |
expenses he or she incurs as a result of administrative
proceedings that may be instituted against him or her under the Israeli securities laws if applicable, and payments made to injured persons
under specific circumstances thereunder; and |
• |
any other matter in respect of which it is
permitted or will be permitted under applicable law to insure the liability of an office holder in the company. |
• |
a breach of the duty of loyalty, except for
indemnification and insurance for a breach of the duty of loyalty to the company to the extent that the office holder acted in good faith
and had a reasonable basis to believe that the act would not prejudice the company; |
• |
a breach of duty of care committed intentionally
or recklessly, excluding a breach arising out of the negligent conduct of the office holder; |
• |
an act or omission committed with intent to
derive illegal personal benefit; or |
• |
a fine, monetary sanction or forfeit levied
against the office holder. |
D. |
Employees |
As of December 31, |
||||||||||||
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
||||||||||
Services, support and fulfillment |
98 |
97 |
100 |
|||||||||
Research and development |
187 |
177 |
171 |
|||||||||
Sales and marketing |
223 |
194 |
198 |
|||||||||
General and administrative |
60 |
65 |
73 |
|||||||||
Total |
568 |
533 |
542 |
E. |
Share Ownership |
A. |
Major Shareholders |
• |
each person or entity known by us to own beneficially
more than 5% of our outstanding shares; |
• |
each of our directors and executive officers
individually; and |
• |
all of our directors and executive officers
as a group. |
Shares Beneficially Owned |
||||||||
Name of Beneficial Owner |
Number |
% |
||||||
Directors and Executive Officers |
||||||||
Reuven Kitov (1) |
1,971,853 |
5.2 |
% | |||||
Reuven Harrison |
1,736,191 |
4.6 |
% | |||||
Jack Wakileh |
* |
* |
||||||
Yoram Gronich |
* |
* |
||||||
Shay Dayan |
* |
* |
||||||
Raymond Brancato |
* |
* |
||||||
Ohad Finkelstein (2) |
500,280 |
1.3 |
% | |||||
Yuval Shachar (3) |
623,147 |
1.6 |
% | |||||
Yair Shamir |
* |
* |
||||||
Edouard Cukierman |
* |
* |
||||||
Peter Campbell |
* |
* |
||||||
Dafna Gruber |
* |
* |
||||||
Tom Schodorf |
* |
* |
||||||
Brian Gumbel |
* |
* |
||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons) (4) |
4,552,493 |
12.0 |
% | |||||
Principal Shareholders |